
From https://twitter.com/MikePFrank/status/1740485323967410534
Compared to human labor in 2023. e.g. if 50% of people get automated but then find new harder physical jobs that AI still can't do, this resolves YES.
Anything that revolves around interacting with the physical world and moving objects counts as a "physical job", even if it doesn't require actual muscle work. e.g. driving is a physical job.
People are also trading
People in developing countries are working for 1 USD per hour. Even if robots are capable of doing most of what a human worker can before 2030(Unlikely in 4 years), the robot won't be cheap enough to replace workers in developing countries like India. So, it is a no to me.
Edit: Even if the robots were good enough to replace anyone before 2030, and cost $0, we would still need a sh*t load of time to manufacture billions of robots.
@Irigi I am not sure now, I will ask more general question instead. Let's say that in 2030 the population of the world is 110% compared to 2023. Total manual labor or all people at 2030 is 80% compared to 2023. Total manual labor including robotic work is 120%. How much human manual labor was replaced in context of this question?